Telesforo Gutierrez-Escamilla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

94 F.3d 651 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Telesforo GUTIERREZ-ESCAMILLA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70366. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 22, 1996. Before BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Telesforo Gutierrez-Escamilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") summarily dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") order denying his application for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition in part and dismiss in part. 3 Gutierrez-Escamilla contends that the BIA erred by summarily dismissing his appeal because the BIA should have considered the merits of his case and reviewed the record for sufficiency of the evidence. Gutierrez-Escamilla further…