Salomone v. Gookin

94 F.3d 652 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William SALOMONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen GOOKIN; William Mendoza, Correctional Counselor II; Lee Dudly, Lt.; Donald Vest, Correctional Counselor II; Chuck Law, Grievance Coordinator, Tim Delp, Correctional Program Manager; William Callahan, Superintendent MICC; Patrick Tice, Correctional Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35167. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 16, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Salomone, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in Salomone's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action alleging due process and equal protection violations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989),…