Daniel Salvador Garcia v. Ivalee Henry, Warden Attorney General, State of California

94 F.3d 652 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel Salvador GARCIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ivalee HENRY, Warden; Attorney General, State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 96-15079. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 22, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Salvador Garcia, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Garcia contends that he is entitled to habeas relief because his conviction for firearm possession in violation of California Penal Code section 12022(c) was not supported by sufficient evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo, Marineau v. Angelone, 25 F.3d 734, 738 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. BACKGROUND 3 According to the relevant evidence adduced at trial, Garcia was seated in the rear passenger seat of a Buick as he…