Mission Resources, Inc.-II v. Texaco Inc.

94 F.3d 652 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. MISSION RESOURCES, INC.--II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXACO INC.; Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.; Texaco Trading & Transportation Inc.; Texaco Exploration and Production Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15242. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 16, 1996. Decided Aug. 16, 1996. Before: NORRIS, T.G. NELSON and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Mission Resources, Inc.--II, ("Mission") appeals from the judgment entered by the district court in favor of appellee Texaco Trading & Transportation Inc. ("Texaco Trading") after the jury returned a general verdict in Mission's favor, but awarded zero damages. Mission also appeals the adverse summary judgment on its claims for damages under Cal.Pub.Util.Code § 2106, loss of profits on the sale of crude oil, intentional interference with contractual relations and prospective economic advantage, and…