Eunice Russell v. Joseph T. Thompson Laura G. Conti James Carey Maupin Maria Carrillo Century 21 Casablanca Realty

94 F.3d 652 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eunice RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph T. THOMPSON; Laura G. Conti; James Carey Maupin; Maria Carrillo; Century 21 Casablanca Realty, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55813. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 8, 1996. * Decided Aug. 14, 1996. Before: D.W. NELSON, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eunice Russell appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against numerous defendants for their roles in the administration of his deceased mother's estate. Russell argues, inter alia, that the district court abused its discretion in declaring him a vexatious litigant. We affirm. 3 The district court's Order restricting the filing of Russell's claims and subsequent dismissal for failure to comply with its order requiring him to furnish security for each defendant are reviewed for abuse of discretion. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th…