Locricchio v. Richards

94 F.3d 652 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony P. LOCRICCHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey RICHARDS, Officer, City and County of Honolulu; John Roes 1-10; Jane Roes 1-10; Roe Corporations 1-10; Roe Partnerships 1-10, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16252. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 12, 1996. Decided Aug. 22, 1996. 1 Before: CANBY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and COLLINS, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Anthony P. Locricchio filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging that his First Amendment rights were violated by police officer Jeffrey Richards and the City and County of Honolulu when Richards arrested Locricchio during an argument about Richards's investigation of a theft. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendants, finding that Richards had probable cause to arrest Locricchio for harassment in violation of Haw.Rev.Stat. § 711-1106(1)(b) (1985). 1 Locricchio appeals the…