Alan J. Mishler, M.D. v. Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners

94 F.3d 652 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alan J. MISHLER, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEVADA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-17013. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 11, 1996. Decided Aug. 15, 1996. Before: BEEZER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges and QUACKENBUSH, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM ** Alan Mishler appeals the district court's decision to deny his motion for leave to amend his original complaint to add new claims against the Nevada Board of Medical Examiners and its members ("NBOMEX") and the district court's decision to grant NBOMEX's motion for summary judgment. Mishler also challenges the district court's denial of his "Motion for Clarification." We affirm in part and reverse in part. I. FACTS In 1987, Mishler filed a § 1983 action against the Nevada Board of Medical Examiners and its members in federal district court in Nevada. Mishler alleged a deprivation of due…