Janice Rodgers Malik Price Marita Rodgers Charles Price Donna Price v. City of Los Angeles Timothy Crass Derek Chew

94 F.3d 652 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Janice RODGERS; Malik Price; Marita Rodgers; Charles Price; Donna Price, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Timothy Crass; Derek Chew, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56568. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued April 10, 1996. Submission Deferred April 22, 1996. Resubmitted July 29, 1996. Decided Aug. 14, 1996. 1 Before: O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges; VAN SICKLE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 On April 22, 1996 we remanded this case to the district court to make factual findings on the following issues: (1) Whether Rodgers' "motions in limine" for judgment as a matter of law regarding the validity of entry and color authority issues, filed the first day of trial, September 27, 1994 were timely; and (2) Whether the district court ruled on such motions. On remand, the court treated the filings as timely and ruled on the motions, stating: "Although the Court did not state on the…