United States v. Donald Hudson

94 F.3d 653 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald HUDSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-56873. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 22, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald Warren Hudson, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). We affirm. 3 Relying on United States v. Lopez, 115 S.Ct. 1624 (1995), Hudson contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face because it exceeds the authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Hanna, 55 F.3d 1456, 1461-62 (9th Cir.1995). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's denial of Hudson's section 2255 motion. AFFIRMED.…