United States v. Keith A. Burgdorfer

Good Law
94 F.3d 653·1996 WL 453443·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37340
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 199695-30098California890 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 653 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith A. BURGDORFER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30098. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 12, 1996. Decided Aug. 9, 1996. 1 Before: BROWNING and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and REA, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendant Keith A. Burgdorfer pleaded guilty to manufacture of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861 (d) and 5841, and he agreed to the forfeiture of his real and personal property pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853 . Burgdorfer's guilty pleas were conditional pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2), preserving his right to appeal the district court's denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence. We affirm the district court's order denying the motion to suppress because the information in the agent's affidavit that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.