United States v. Leonard Cooper and Tanya Cooper, United States of America v. A.C. Allen

Good Law
94 F.3d 653·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37310
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 199695-50435California2,789 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 653 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonard COOPER and Tanya Cooper, Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. A.C. ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50435, 95-50483, 95-50473. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 4, 1996. * Decided Aug. 22, 1996. 1 Before: BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** OVERVIEW 3 Following a joint jury trial, Leonard Cooper (95-50435) appeals his convictions and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for conspiracy, unlawful food stamp acquisition, unlawful presentation of food stamps for redemption, and false statement. A.C. Allen (95-50473) appeals his conviction for conspiracy; and Tanya Cooper (95-50483) appeals her convictions for conspiracy and unlawful food stamp acquisition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.