Gerald I. Washington v. Honeywell, Inc.

94 F.3d 654 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gerald I. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HONEYWELL, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55590. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1995. Decided Aug. 13, 1996. ORDER The petition for rehearing is denied except to the extent corrections are reflected in the amended memorandum disposition filed simultaneously with this order. Before: FLETCHER, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 AMENDED MEMORANDUM * 2 Gerald I. Washington appeals the grant of summary judgment to Honeywell, Inc., dismissing his age and race discrimination action. The action, based on California state law claims, was removed to federal court by Honeywell on diversity grounds. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm in part and reverse in part. 3 * Because of Honeywell's challenges, we must determine which of the materials Washington has submitted are properly before us. We…