Wa-Gino v. Arizona Dept. of Corrections

94 F.3d 654 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Wande WA-GINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, and officials; Samuel Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; D.C. Harkins, Deputy Warden; Sgt. Morgan; Officer 5596, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16931. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 16, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Wande Wa-Gino appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging the constitutionality of a prison grievance procedure and alleging that prison officials failed to secure his personal property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. 3 We review de novo the district court's Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of an action. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1054 (9th…