Wood v. Gomez

94 F.3d 654 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert James Ossawa WOOD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James H. GOMEZ, Director, CDC; Judith McGillivrary, Dir. PHD; Daniel E. Lungren; Attorney General, State of California; Julian S. Marquez, Warden, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-56442. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 22, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert James Wood, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed the petition for Wood's failure to exhaust or dismiss a single ex post facto claim which, the district court determined, Wood had failed to present to the highest state court. 3 Wood contends on appeal that the district court erred. He argues the merits of all his claims, but he does not make any showing that he, in fact, presented his ex post facto…