Goehring v. Brophy

Good Law
94 F.3d 1294·96 Daily Journal DAR 10790·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22679·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6551
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 199695-15009California7,654 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 1294 112 Ed. Law Rep. 37 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6551 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10 ,790 Gregory P. GOEHRING; David Mueller; John P. Gisla, Jr.; Nancy Harder; Glenn Nunes; John Mullen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Roy T. BROPHY, Jr.; David Pierpont Gardner; Theodore L. Hullar; Robert E. Chason, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-16453, 95-15009. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 9, 1996. Decided Sept. 3, 1996. Richard M. Stephens, Olympia, Washington, for plaintiffs-appellants. Christopher M. Patti, Regents of University of California, Office of the General Counsel, University of California, Oakland, California, for defendants-appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-92-00962-EJG. Before FERGUSON, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: 1 The plaintiffs, students at the University of California at Davis ("the University"), appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the University with respect to their free exercise of religion claim. The plaintiffs allege that the University's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.