96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6673, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,937 Apusento Garden (Guam) Inc., Formerly Known as Taiyo Development (Guam) Inc. v. Superior Court of Guam, and Inland Builders Corporation, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellee

Good Law
94 F.3d 1346
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 6, 199693-17296California3,803 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 1346 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6673 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,937 APUSENTO GARDEN (GUAM) INC., formerly known as Taiyo Development (Guam) Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM, Respondent, and Inland Builders Corporation, Real-party-in-interest-Appellee. No. 93-17296. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 8, 1995. Decided Sept. 6, 1996. Kevin M. Fong, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, California, Thomas C. Sterling, Klemm, Blair, Sterling & Johnson, Agana, Guam, for plaintiff-appellant. Garry W. Morse, Carlsmith Ball Wichman Case & Ichiki, Agana, Guam, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Territory of Guam, Appellate Division, Munson, * Chief Judge, Rafeedie, ** and Lamorena, *** Judges, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-00042-MRL. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and THOMPSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: 1 In resolving this appeal from an arbitration award, we must examine the mandamus jurisdiction of the federal district court over the Superior Court of the Territory of Guam. 2 * Apusento Garden (Guam) Inc. ("Apusento Garden") appeals the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.