Eldridge v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Joint Apprenticeship And Training Committee

Good Law
94 F.3d 1366·96 Daily Journal DAR 10970·69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,344·71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1385·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23434
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 199693-16925California3,815 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 1366 71 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1385 , 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,344 , 65 USLW 2239 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6712 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10 ,970 Linda ELDREDGE, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CARPENTERS 46 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNTIES JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING COMMITTEE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16925. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. Decided Sept. 9, 1996. Alberta M. Blumin, Oakland, California, for plaintiffs-appellants. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger, and Rosenfeld, San Francisco, California; Lawrence H. Kay, Stanton, Kay & Watson, Sacramento, California, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John P. Vukasin, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-75-2062-JPV. Before FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 Twenty-one years and three appeals ago, Linda Eldredge brought this class action against the Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee ("JATC"), alleging that the method it used to select carpentry apprentices…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.