Harrison

Harrison v. Scottsdale Insurance

Good Law
34 F. App'x 362
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 2002No. 00-15401. D.C. No. CV-99-06707-RECCalifornia83 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Because the underlying complaint did not allege bodily injury or property damage within the meaning of the Harrison’s commercial general liability policy, we affirm. See Waller v. Truck Ins. Exch., Inc., 11 Cal.4th 1 , 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370 , 900 P.2d 619, 630 (1995). Scottsdale’s motion for sanctions is denied.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.