Allison v. Badgett

Good Law
95 F.3d 1156·1996 WL 471417·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38410
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 199695-17351California465 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Cody ALLISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Travis BADGETT, Deputy Warden; Samuel Lewis; Grant Woods, Attorney General; Sue Boers; Tim Murphy; Dewayne Beck; Tom McDonald; Fife Symington; J.C. Keeney; Gordon Bueler; Mark Albrecht; Christl; R. Cochran; William Haro; Meg Savage; B. Narrine, J.R. Upchurch C. Ryan, Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17351. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Robert Cody Allison appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 3 We AFFIRM. 4 The district court did not err in dismissing Allison's claims relating to Casey v. Lewis, Gluth v. Kangas, and Hook v. State of Arizona because Allison is a member of the classes certified in these actions.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.