Bank v. Bowles

95 F.3d 1156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. DANA NIGUEL BANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Erskine BOWLES, Administrator of the Small Business Administration and the Small Business Administration, an agency of the government of the United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55567. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 8, 1996. * Decided Aug. 13, 1996. Before: D.W. NELSON, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dana Niguel Bank (DNB) appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants, denial of DNB's motion for summary judgment and motion to vacate summary judgment, and all of the court's other previously entered interlocutory orders and decisions. DNB also seeks attorney's fees. DNB contends that the court erred in concluding that DNB violated 13 C.F.R. § 120.201-1 and § 6 of the Loan Guaranty Agreement between DNB and the Small Business Administration (SBA). We affirm the…