John Bartholomew Carla Bartholomew v. Sheryl Stassi-Lampman, Pat Roth

Good Law
95 F.3d 1156·1996 WL 477006·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38403
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 199694-16200California1,737 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John BARTHOLOMEW; Carla Bartholomew, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sheryl STASSI-LAMPMAN, Pat Roth et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. Decided Aug. 21, 1996. Before: BROWNING, CANBY and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiffs/appellants John and Carla Bartholomew appeal the district court's judgment granting defendants' motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs alleged violations of their federal civil rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 , 1985, and 1986. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. I. 3 Three foster children were removed from plaintiffs' home in February 1992. The defendants Sheryl Stassi-Lampman, a former employee of the County of Yuba, and Pat Roth, an employee of the State of California, were involved in this removal. Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.