Acuna v. Cambra

95 F.3d 1156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arcadio S. ACUNA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven CAMBRA; Charles D. Marshall, Warden; J. McGrath; H. Helsel, Program Administrator; S. Lawrence; J. Briddle, Senior Hearing Officer; B.D. Birondo, Sergeant; R.L. Lucas, Sergeant; B.E. Stacey; Leovitch, Correctional Officer and Zlokovitch, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17135. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Arcadio S. Acuna appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against defendant prison officials. 1 Acuna alleged that the defendants violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by enacting and enforcing prison regulations that limit his ability to assist other inmates in legal matters. Acuna also alleged that these…