Codar, Inc., a California Corporation v. State of Arizona Arizona State Banking Department

95 F.3d 1156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. CODAR, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. STATE OF ARIZONA; Arizona State Banking Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16902. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 14, 1996. Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and WEINER, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-appellant, Codar, Inc., a debt collection agency incorporated in California, brought suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from Arizona's licensing scheme, which requires out-of-state debt collectors to obtain an Arizona license before operating in the state. Codar appeals the district court's decision granting the defendants' Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The district court held that Codar did not state sufficient facts to maintain its claim that Arizona's statutory scheme violates the Commerce…