Confederated Tribes & Bands of Yakama Indian Nation v. Baldrige

Good Law
95 F.3d 1157·1996 WL 459916·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38439
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 199695-36104California1,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. CONFEDERATED TRIBES & BANDS OF the YAKAMA INDIAN NATION, Plaintiff, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Defendant, and TULALIP TRIBE; Stillaguamish Tribe; Quinault Indian Nation; United States of America; Hoh Tribe; Quileute Indian Tribe; Lummi Tribe; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation; Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, v. ALASKA TROLLERS ASSOCIATION, Applicant in intervention-Appellant. No. 95-36104. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1996. Decided Aug. 13, 1996. Before: WRIGHT, PREGERSON, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges: 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The Alaska Trollers' Association (ATA) appeals the district court's denial of its motion to intervene as of right and its refusal to consider ATA's request for permissive intervention in the litigation resulting in the order published at 898 F.Supp.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.