Husty v. Ravenswood City Elementary School Dist.

95 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kip Douglas HUSTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAVENSWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT; R.B. Jones; James Davis; Clarence Burley; Charles Mae Knight; Steven Waterman; Lois Frontino; Chet James and Marthelia Hargrove, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16976. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges: 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kip Husty appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Ravenswood School District, et al. The district court held that Husty's action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was barred by res judicata. 3 We AFFIRM. 4 Under the Federal Full Faith and Credit Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1738 , "a federal court must give to a state-court judgment the same preclusive effect as would be given that judgment under the law of the State in which the judgment was entered." Migra v. Warren City…