Lamont Harper v. George Betor Robert Davis Marvin Branscome Terry Ebert City of Compton Sherman Block County of Los Angeles

95 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lamont HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George BETOR; Robert Davis; Marvin Branscome; Terry Ebert City of Compton; Sherman Block; County of Los Angeles, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-55080. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 9, 1996. Decided Aug. 13, 1996. Before: D.W. NELSON, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Lamont Harper appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 action against the County of Los Angeles and Sherman Block, the county sheriff. See also Monell v. Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978). Harper claims that he provided evidence of harm sufficient for his case to survive summary judgment. Harper also claims that the district court erred by failing to rule on his objection to the affidavits of Block and municipal judge Albert J. Garcia before granting summary judgment. In…