Forrest Lee Jones v. Rosie B. Garcia, Warden James Gomez Attorney General of the State of California, Forrest Lee Jones v. James H. Gomez Rosie B. Garcia, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

95 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Forrest Lee JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rosie B. GARCIA, Warden; James Gomez; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. Forrest Lee JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James H. GOMEZ; Rosie B. Garcia, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-16795, 95-16797. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Forrest Lee Jones appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petitions challenging his guilty plea conviction to two counts of residential burglary. Jones contends that his guilty plea was not voluntary and intelligent and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , 1291. We review de novo, Calderon v.…