Couch v. Department of Fish and Wildlife

Good Law
95 F.3d 1157·1996 WL 471903·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38435
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 199695-36184California961 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Clark COUCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Guy Wolcott, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE; Randy Fisher, Director of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Rod Ingram, Assistant Director of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Pete Barnhisel, Member of the Commission of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Susan Foster, Member of the Commission of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Jim Habberstad, Member of the Commission of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Bob Jacobson, Member of the Commission of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Katy O'Toole-Spencer, Member of the Commission of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Phillip W. Schneider, Member of the Commission of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Jim Van Loan, Member of the Commission of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-36184. United States Court of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.