Mahon v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
95 F.3d 1157·1996 WL 481591·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38423
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 199695-55460California899 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Johnnie Ray MAHON, aka: Johnnie R. Mahon; aka: Johnny Ray Mahon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Los Angeles Police Department; John Doe, Director, individually & in his or her official capacity; John Doe, Jail Commander, individually & in his or her official capacity; Unknown Purdy, Detective; Unknown Detective; Johnnie Chamness, Sargent in his official capacity; City of Hollywood; Hollywood Police Department; John Doe, Director individually & in his or her official capacity; County of Los Angeles; Does 1-20; Eric Nmi Lavine, in his official capacity; unknown Detective, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55460. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 23, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Johnnie Ray Mahon appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.