Robert W. Lord v. Frank Sauser, Superintendent Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent State of Alaska

Good Law
95 F.3d 1157·1996 WL 471441·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38434
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 199695-35640California517 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert W. LORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank SAUSER, Superintendent; Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent; State of Alaska, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35640. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alaska state prisoner Robert W. Lord appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Lord contends that the district court erred by concluding that he was not denied access to the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 We may affirm the district court on any basis supported by the record. United States v. Washington, 969 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1051 (1993). We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.