Together Development Corp. v. A Better Choice Ltd.

95 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. TOGETHER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. A BETTER CHOICE LTD.; Brian C. Popko; Prodata Institute; American Millionaires, Inc.; A Million Connections, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, v. Will KNEDLIK, Appellant. No. 95-35476. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brian Popko appeals pro se the district court's partial grant of Together Development Corporation's ("TDC") motion for default judgment. 3 We AFFIRM. 4 TDC argues that Popko's appeal should be dismissed because the notice of appeal was filed from the non-final order dated April 4, 1995. TDC contends that the order was not final because the district court deferred ruling on the amount of TDC's attorney's fees and damages. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(2) provides that a notice of appeal "filed after the…