Terflinger v. Baird

95 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard L. TERFLINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lourdes G. BAIRD, United States Attorney; James P. Walsh, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General for the State of California; Ira Reiner, District Attorney for the County of Los Angeles; Sherman T. Block, Sheriff for the County of Los Angeles, California, Defendants, and Hayward Barnett, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-55058. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 23, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Richard L. Terflinger appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant Hayward Barnett in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action seeking declaratory relief and damages. Terflinger alleged that Barnett violated his Fourth Amendment rights and denied him due process by impeding his access to the courts when…