In re Reilly

95 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Don Byron REILLY & Mary Lou Reilly, Debtors. Don Byron REILLY; Mary Lou Reilly, Appellants, v. CITIZENS STATE BANK; Bruce H. Hussey; Nettie Mae Brown; Farm Credit Bank of Spokane, Appellees. No. 95-35537. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chapter 7 debtors Don Byron Reilly and Mary Lou Reilly appeal an order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") holding that a final decree of the bankruptcy court was not an appealable order and that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Reillys' motion for reconsideration. 3 The BAP's order was entered on April 12, 1995. On April 27, 1995, the Reillys filed a motion for clarification which was treated as a motion for rehearing filed pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 8015. Because the Reillys motion for rehearing…