Myers v. Shumacher

Good Law
95 F.3d 1158·1996 WL 481699·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38213
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 199696-15264California254 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dave SHUMACHER, Assistant Superintendent CCI IV-B Tehachapi; Terry Olsen, Superintendent CCI IV-B Tehachapi; J. Silva, Production Manager II CCI IV-B Tehachapi; R. Mattly, Wood Products Supervisor CCI IV-B Tehachapi, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15264. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 26, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner John Myers appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of Myers's civil rights action regarding his employment in 1990 at the rough mill of the furniture factory for Prison Industries--Tehachapi. We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation filed on December 5, 1995, which were adopted in full by the district court's Order filed on January 3, 1996. AFFIRMED. 1 * The panel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.