Salvador Ali Maradiaga v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
95 F.3d 1158·1996 WL 473789·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38227
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 199695-70238California4,297 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Salvador Ali MARADIAGA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70238. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 11, 1996. Decided Aug. 20, 1996. 1 Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, INS No. Azh-ftb-nga. INS PETITION GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART 2 Before: FERNANDEZ and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District Judge. * 3 MEMORANDUM ** 4 Salvador Ali Maradiaga ("Maradiaga"), a native and citizen of Nicaragua, departed his country and entered the United States without inspection in 1989, in violation of § 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the "Act"), 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (A)(2). We deny the petition as to the Board of Immigration Appeals' (the "Board") denial of Maradiaga's request for asylum and withholding of deportation, under sections 208 and 243(h) of the Act, 8 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.