Kent W. Porter, Sr. v. Joan K. Ortiz Diann A. Smith Danny K. Marshall

Good Law
95 F.3d 1158·1996 WL 481794·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38211
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 199696-35244California261 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1158 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kent W. PORTER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joan K. ORTIZ; Diann A. Smith; Danny K. Marshall, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-35244. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 26, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Kent W. Porter, Sr., a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his action alleging that Steilacoom Indian Tribe Chairperson Joan Ortiz, Vice-Chairman Danny Marshall, and Secretary Diann Smith conspired with officials of the Bureau of Indian Affairs to deprive Porter of his First Amendment rights by warning Porter to cease communicating with federal officials and by threatening to alienate him from the tribe if he continued to refer to himself as "Chief." We are compelled by Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir.1988), to vacate and remand because the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.