United States v. Mark B. Ingraham, United States of America v. Delbert Duane Young, United States of America v. Peter J. McKenna United States of America v. James P. Doherty

Good Law
95 F.3d 1159·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38283
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 199696-30341California299 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1159 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark B. INGRAHAM, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Delbert Duane YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter J. McKENNA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James P. DOHERTY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30307, 93-30308, 93-30315, 96-30341. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 6, 1994. Submission Deferred Dec. 15, 1994. Resubmitted and Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: POOLE, BRUNETTI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. ORDER This case is resubmitted as of the file date of this order. Before: POOLE, BRUNETTI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants contend that the seizures and forfeitures of their properties barred subsequent prosecution and punishment under the Double Jeopardy Clause. We deferred submission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.