United States v. 88843 Ross Lane, Springfield, OR

95 F.3d 1159 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 88843 ROSS LANE, SPRINGFIELD, OR, One Parcel of Real Property, with buildings, attachments and appurtenances, commonly known as 88843 Ross Lane, Springfield, Lane County, Oregon, Defendant, and Jerry Donald STEWART, Claimant-Appellant, Lane County, Intervenor. No. 95-36250. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerry Donald Stewart appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for the return of real property located at 88843 Ross Lane, Springfield, Oregon. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 Stewart contends that the Double Jeopardy Clause barred the civil forfeiture of the real property. This contention is foreclosed by the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in…