Frederick Vallee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

95 F.3d 1160 78 A.F.T.R.2d 96 -6413 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frederick VALLEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-70115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 26, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederick Vallee appeals pro se the tax court's order dismissing for failure to prosecute pursuant to Tax Court Rule 123(b) Vallee's petition for a redetermination of a federal income tax deficiency and additions to tax asserted against him by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for tax year 1992. The tax court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the petition where Vallee, who asserted frivolous arguments regarding the tax court's constitutional illegitimacy as a tribunal for adjudication of his petition, failed to appear at trial after notice and warning that failure to appear may result in dismissal.…