United States v. Johnny Horton Weekes, United States of America v. Lori Weekes, United States of America v. Amy Wendell Rice, United States of America v. Tim Weekes
Opinion
Opinion
95 F.3d 1160 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny Horton WEEKES, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lori WEEKES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amy Wendell RICE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tim WEEKES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30068 to 95-30071. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 1995. Decided Aug. 21, 1996. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and TANNER * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Johnny Weekes, Lori Weekes, Amy Rice and Tim Weekes all challenge the district court's imposition of sentences following their guilty pleas to an indictment charging them with manufacturing and distributing methamphetamine. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal. STANDARDS OF REVIEW 4 "The district court's interpretation and application of the…