United States v. William Russell Snow, Jr.

Good Law
95 F.3d 1160·1996 WL 481713·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38450
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 199696-30053California325 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1160 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Russell SNOW, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-30053. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 26, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner William Russell Snow appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) motion to modify his sentence following his conviction for manufacturing over 100 marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Snow contends that the district court erred by failing to apply Amendment 516 of the Sentencing Guidelines retroactively. Snow, however, was sentenced to sixty months imprisonment which is the mandatory minimum sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(B). Accordingly, we agree with the district court's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.