United States v. Rudy Vargas

95 F.3d 1160 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudy VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50320. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 23, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rudy Vargas appeals his conviction and 77-month sentence following a jury conviction of two counts of robbery of a post office in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Vargas' attorney has filed a brief stating he finds no issues for review. Vargas has also filed a pro se supplemental brief. After conducting an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), coupled with an examination of the issues Vargas has raised in his supplemental brief, we affirm the district court's judgment. 3 In his pro se supplemental brief, Vargas contends that (1) the evidence was…