Zankich v. Maricopa County, Ariz.

Good Law
95 F.3d 1160·1996 WL 481811·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38451
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 199695-16336California940 words

Opinion

Opinion

95 F.3d 1160 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Vincent ZANKICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA; Tom Rawles, individually and in his official capacity as members of the constituting the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County Arizona; Jim Bruner, individually and in his official capacity as member of and constituting the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County Arizona; Betsey Bayless, Individually and in her official capacity as member of and constituting the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County Arizona; Ed King, Individually and in his official capacity as member of and constituting the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County Arizona; Mary Rose Wilcox, individually and in her official capacity as member of and constituting the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Maricopa County Arizona; Tom Agnos, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.