United States v. Michael T. Summers

95 F.3d 1160 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael T. SUMMERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-35669. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 19, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael T. Summers appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his conviction and sentence imposed following a guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). Summers contends that the state of Oregon lacked authority to prosecute him as a convicted felon in possession of a firearm because his civil rights had been fully restored upon his discharge from prison. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 1291. We review de novo, Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451-52 (9th Cir.1995), and affirm. 3 It is a felony…