Crawford v. Lungren

Good Law
96 Daily Journal DAR 11066·96 F.3d 380·24 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2576·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23907·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6768
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 199695-56570California5,499 words

Opinion

Opinion

96 F.3d 380 65 USLW 2204 , 24 Media L. Rep. 2576 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6768 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11 ,066 Bryan H. CRAWFORD; Jim Atwell, a partnership doing business as Advanced Publications; ISG Communications Inc., a California Corporation; Bold Type, Inc., a California Corporation; Wayne C. Berry, doing business as ZAP Distributors; and Lisa Lascody, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel E. LUNGREN, Attorney General, individually and as Attorney General of the State of California; James K. Hahn, individually and as City Attorney for the City of Los Angeles; Willie Williams, Chief of Police, individually and as Police Chief for the City of Los Angeles; Gilbert Garcetti, District Attorney, individually and as District Attorney of the County of Los Angeles; Thomas W. Sneddon, District Attorney, individually and as District Attorney for the County of Santa Barbara, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56570. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 11, 1996. Decided Sept. 11, 1996. Stanley Fleishman, Fleishman, Fisher & Moest, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiffs-appellants. Christopher C. Foley, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.