Ramsey v. Kantor

Good Law
96 F.3d 434
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 199695-35471California6,724 words

Opinion

Opinion

96 F.3d 434 43 ERC 1627 , 27 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,158, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7008 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11 ,513 James A. RAMSEY; Elf Atochem North America; Aluminum Company of America; Columbia Aluminum Corporation; Columbia Falls Aluminum Company; Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation; Intalco Aluminum Corporation; Northwest Aluminum Company; Reynolds Metals Company; Vanalco, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mickey KANTOR, * in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce; United States Department of Commerce; National Marine Fisheries Service; Pacific Fishery Management Council; Phillip Anderson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Pacific Fisheries Management Council; North Pacific Fisheries Management Council; Richard B. Lauber, in his official capacity as Chairman of North Pacific Fisheries Management Council; Bruce Babbitt, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Interior; U.S. Fish & Wildlife; State of Oregon; Rod Ingram, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; State of Alaska; Carl L. Rosier, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game; State of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.