United States v. Jeffrey Joe Alerta

Caution
96 Daily Journal DAR 11597·96 F.3d 1230·1996 WL 535047·36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 139·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24812
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 199695-10224California5,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

I.

Defendant Jeffrey James Alerta appeals his convictions and sentences for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (Count 1); conspiracy to use firearms during and in relation to drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Count 2); distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) (Count 3); possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) (Count 4); and use of a firearm during and in relation to drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(1) (Count 5).

Alerta raises two points on appeal that have merit: (1) he contends that the fact that the weapon he used or carried was a machine gun, which added 25 years to his sentence, is an element of the crime under section 924(c)(1) that must be found by the jury; and (2) he contends that he was improperly convicted and given consecutive sentences for two conspiracies when there was only one.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We reverse the conviction on Count 5 because the jury did not expressly find that Alerta carried or used a machine gun, and nothing in the jury’s verdicts leads…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.