96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7119, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,681 Humberto Alvarez-Machain v. United States of America Antonio Garate-Bustamante Francisco Sosa, and Hector Berellez Bill Waters Pete Gruden Jack Lawn, Humberto Alvarez-Machain v. United States of America, Humberto Alvarez-Machain v. United States of America, and Francisco Sosa Antonio Garate-Bustamante

Good Law
96 F.3d 1246
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 199695-55464California3,728 words

Opinion

Opinion

96 F.3d 1246 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7119 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,681 Humberto ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America; Antonio Garate-Bustamante; Francisco Sosa, Defendants, and Hector Berellez; Bill Waters; Pete Gruden; Jack Lawn, Defendants-Appellants. Humberto ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendant-Appellant. Humberto ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, and Francisco Sosa; Antonio Garate-Bustamante, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 95-55464, 95-55768 and 95-56121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 8, 1996. Decided Sept. 24, 1996. Paul Hoffman, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee. Robert M. Loeb, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants. Michael L. Martinez, Holland & Knight, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellants. Gary S. Lincenberg and Thomas V. Reichert, Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert & Matz, Los Angeles, CA; Charles S. Leeper and Karl N. Metzner, Spriggs & Hollingsworth, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.