David Wayne Sconce v. Gil Garcetti, District Attorney Harvey Giss, District Attorney, David Wayne Sconce v. Sam Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections Attorney General of the State of California

Good Law
96 F.3d 1451·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28729
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 199696-55209California4,332 words

Opinion

Opinion

96 F.3d 1451 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David Wayne SCONCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gil GARCETTI, District Attorney; Harvey Giss, District Attorney, Defendants-Appellees. David Wayne SCONCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sam LEWIS, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellants. Nos. 96-55209, 96-56095. * United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 8, 1996. Decided Aug. 29, 1996. ORDER Plaintiff's motion to consolidate appeals is GRANTED. Before: REINHARDT, HALL, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Petitioner, David Wayne Sconce, an Arizona state prisoner who is currently in custody in California awaiting trial, appeals the denial of his petitions for a writ of habeas corpus and his request for a preliminary injunction. Sconce alleges that the state of California has violated his fourteenth amendment right to due process by not fulfilling the terms of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.