Four Seasons Freight Services, Inc. v. Haralson

96 F.3d 1451 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FOUR SEASONS FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., f/k/a Four Seasons Truck Brokerage, Inc., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael A. HARALSON and Terri Haralson, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-35703. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1996. Decided Sep. 04, 1996. Before: ALARCON, NORRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Michael A. Haralson and Terri Haralson ("the Haralsons") appeal from the injunction issued by the district court prohibiting Mr. Haralson from engaging in any business with companies on Four Seasons Freight Services' ("Four Seasons") customer list for a period of four years. The district court denied the Haralsons' motion for a summary judgment. The court rejected the Haralsons' claim that the parties' covenant not to compete is void as a general restraint of trade. The court also ruled that the covenant was unreasonable…